Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Archetype | magic_milkshake | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Jeskai Convoke | crovax90 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Midrange | foodchainen | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Flash | aleister95 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Soldiers , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo , Azorius Tokens Control , Bant Auras
Meta Performance Analysis
Disdainful Stroke ranks #93 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 30%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 52.8%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Disdainful Stroke is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 21.59 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.6%. Disdainful Stroke has a win rate of 75.0%, making it 4.7% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Disdainful Stroke than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 16 | 84.7% | 74.0% | +10.7% |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 1 | 5 | 79.2% | 72.8% | +6.4% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 11 | 78.8% | 73.2% | +5.6% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 10 | 79.6% | 74.1% | +5.5% |
| Faerie Mastermind | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 2 | 6 | 78.4% | 73.1% | +5.2% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 18 | 77.1% | 72.6% | +4.6% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 9 | 78.0% | 73.5% | +4.5% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 10 | 77.0% | 72.8% | +4.2% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 15 | 78.1% | 73.9% | +4.2% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 10 | 76.3% | 72.7% | +3.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 447 | 22.1% | 43.9% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 203 | 36.7% | 48.2% |
| Temur Otters | 72 | 21.8% | 39.7% |
| Esper Pixie | 66 | 4.4% | 57.3% |
| Azorius Tempo | 64 | 16.2% | 39.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.